Is Northbeam or The Ad Spend better for attribution?

Northbeam — that's its core discipline: multi-touch attribution, MMM and incrementality that assign revenue credit across channels. The Ad Spend doesn't compete there. It works inside the account: a permanent record of every change, detection every ~6 hours, causal explanations, and approve-then-execute action.

Can Northbeam tell me why performance changed?

It can show you which channel's numbers moved and how credit shifted — measurement, not diagnosis. It doesn't record that someone narrowed geo targeting on Tuesday at 9am, or trace the CPA jump to that edit. That operational "why" is what The Ad Spend's record and causal inference provide.

Can I run Northbeam and The Ad Spend together?

Yes, and it's a coherent stack: Northbeam measures which channels deserve budget; The Ad Spend keeps the record of what changed inside each account, detects problems between check-ins, and turns recommendations into approved actions. Measurement above, operations below.

Which should a lean team buy first?

Depends on the pain. If you distrust your channel-level numbers, that's Northbeam. If the recurring failure is "something changed, nobody noticed for a week, and nobody can say why the metric moved" — that's the gap The Ad Spend closes, at a lower lift than a measurement migration.

← Compare

Comparison · Marketing measurement

The Ad Spend vs. Northbeam

Northbeam tells you which channel got credit. We tell you which decision moved the number.

The Ad Spend vs. Northbeam — feature comparison
Capability	The Ad Spend	Northbeam
Channel attribution, MMM & incrementality	Attribution (private beta)	Yes
Permanent settings-change record per account	Yes	No
Continuous detection of account changes	Yes	No
Traces a move to the exact change (config-level)	Yes	Channel-level
Acts on the finding (recommend, approve, execute)	Yes	No

Northbeam's strength is measurement: multi-touch attribution, media-mix modeling and incrementality testing that assign credit across channels. The Ad Spend sits underneath the account — capturing every setting change, tracing a performance shift to the exact change with causal inference, detecting continuously, and turning recommendations into approved actions. Northbeam answers which channel deserves credit; The Ad Spend answers which decision moved the metric, and what to do next. They're complementary.

Frequently asked

Is Northbeam or The Ad Spend better for attribution?: Northbeam — that's its core discipline: multi-touch attribution, MMM and incrementality that assign revenue credit across channels. The Ad Spend doesn't compete there. It works inside the account: a permanent record of every change, detection every ~6 hours, causal explanations, and approve-then-execute action.
Can Northbeam tell me why performance changed?: It can show you which channel's numbers moved and how credit shifted — measurement, not diagnosis. It doesn't record that someone narrowed geo targeting on Tuesday at 9am, or trace the CPA jump to that edit. That operational "why" is what The Ad Spend's record and causal inference provide.
Can I run Northbeam and The Ad Spend together?: Yes, and it's a coherent stack: Northbeam measures which channels deserve budget; The Ad Spend keeps the record of what changed inside each account, detects problems between check-ins, and turns recommendations into approved actions. Measurement above, operations below.
Which should a lean team buy first?: Depends on the pain. If you distrust your channel-level numbers, that's Northbeam. If the recurring failure is "something changed, nobody noticed for a week, and nobody can say why the metric moved" — that's the gap The Ad Spend closes, at a lower lift than a measurement migration.

See how the engine works