← Compare

Comparison · MMM & incrementality

The Ad Spend vs. Measured

Measured proves whether a channel is incremental. The Ad Spend shows which edit lines up with the move.

Geo and split incrementality tests
The Ad SpendNot the job
MeasuredYes
Observed settings-change timeline
The Ad SpendYes
MeasuredNot its stated job
Puts a config edit beside the move
The Ad SpendA lead, not a verdict
MeasuredNot its stated job
Continuous account review
The Ad SpendRefresh about every 6 hours; Trends on weekdays
MeasuredExperiment cycles
Approves an account change
The Ad SpendYes, Optimizer in private beta
MeasuredNot its stated job

Measured answers channel causality: design a geo or split test, measure incremental sales, and feed that into a mix model. That is the right tool when the debate is whether a channel deserves the budget.

The Ad Spend answers a tighter question, and it is the better tool for it. Inside the account, which captured change lines up with the move, and what should be approved next. It does not run geo experiments. Its causal language is a lead, not a verdict. The two questions are both real. They are not the same product.

Choose

The Ad Spend

Choose The Ad Spend when the question is what changed inside the account.

Choose

Measured

Choose Measured when the question is whether a channel is incremental at all.

Frequently asked

Do they answer the same question?
No. Measured is channel incrementality. The Ad Spend is the captured edit beside the metric. Different questions. The Ad Spend is the one that also proposes the next account change.
Can we use both?
Yes. Measured for the budget case. The Ad Spend for the accounts that budget lands in.
Which first?
If leadership doubts the channel, Measured. If the team cannot say what changed last week, The Ad Spend.
Does The Ad Spend run lift tests?
No. That stays with Measured.

The record

Stop running an account that forgets.

Bring captured changes, performance, and business context together for the next review.