Do Measured and The Ad Spend answer the same question?

No. Measured answers channel-level causality: is this channel actually incremental, and how much should it get? The Ad Spend answers operational causality: inside the account, which specific change moved the metric, when, and what to do next — on a permanent record. Different questions, both worth answering.

Can I use Measured and The Ad Spend together?

Yes — they're complementary rather than competing. Measured's geo experiments and MMM inform how budget is allocated across channels. The Ad Spend manages what happens inside the accounts that budget lands in: the change record, continuous detection, causal explanations, and approve-then-execute fixes.

Which should we adopt first?

Match the tool to the recurring question. If the debate is whether a channel deserves its budget at all, start with Measured. If the recurring question is "what changed, and why did CPA move?" — especially across multiple people touching the account — start with The Ad Spend.

Does The Ad Spend run incrementality tests?

No geo experiments — that's Measured's discipline. The Ad Spend's causal inference works on the account's own change record, connecting metric movements to the specific settings changes behind them. Its Attribution feature (private beta) ties decisions to closed revenue through your CRM.

← Compare

Comparison · MMM & incrementality

The Ad Spend vs. Measured

Measured proves channel incrementality. We explain the change inside the account.

The Ad Spend vs. Measured — feature comparison
Capability	The Ad Spend	Measured
Channel incrementality testing & MMM	Not our focus	Yes
Operational causality (a move traced to a change)	Yes	No
Permanent settings-change record	Yes	No
Continuous detection across the account	Yes	No
Recommends and executes changes (with approval)	Yes	No

Measured runs automated geo experiments and Bayesian MMM to answer whether a channel is incremental — invaluable for budget allocation across hard-to-track media. The Ad Spend answers a different, complementary question: inside the account, which specific change moved performance, when, and what to do next — with continuous detection and approve-then-execute action, all written to a permanent record. Both are causal, at different layers: Measured at the channel, The Ad Spend at the decision.

Frequently asked

Do Measured and The Ad Spend answer the same question?: No. Measured answers channel-level causality: is this channel actually incremental, and how much should it get? The Ad Spend answers operational causality: inside the account, which specific change moved the metric, when, and what to do next — on a permanent record. Different questions, both worth answering.
Can I use Measured and The Ad Spend together?: Yes — they're complementary rather than competing. Measured's geo experiments and MMM inform how budget is allocated across channels. The Ad Spend manages what happens inside the accounts that budget lands in: the change record, continuous detection, causal explanations, and approve-then-execute fixes.
Which should we adopt first?: Match the tool to the recurring question. If the debate is whether a channel deserves its budget at all, start with Measured. If the recurring question is "what changed, and why did CPA move?" — especially across multiple people touching the account — start with The Ad Spend.
Does The Ad Spend run incrementality tests?: No geo experiments — that's Measured's discipline. The Ad Spend's causal inference works on the account's own change record, connecting metric movements to the specific settings changes behind them. Its Attribution feature (private beta) ties decisions to closed revenue through your CRM.

See how the engine works