Despite their long history as an advertising medium, billboards continue to spark debates and generate headlines in 2024. An analysis of controversial billboard campaigns offers valuable insights into the enduring power of out-of-home advertising and its potential impact on brand perception and ad spend allocation.

Political Controversies

In the lead-up to the 2024 Indonesian General Election, billboards have become a focal point of political controversy. A study on memes criticizing politician billboards revealed widespread public dissatisfaction with the excessive number and placement of these advertisements. The memes highlighted four main criticisms:

1. Excessive number and placement of political billboards

2. Perceived unimportance of billboards compared to other pressing issues

3. Lack of empathy from politicians during economic difficulties

4. Self-promotion at the expense of addressing real concerns

This controversy underscores the potential backlash that can occur when political advertising is perceived as tone-deaf or excessive.

Strategic Ambiguity in Advertising

Research has shown that strategic ambiguity in billboard taglines can significantly influence consumer attention. This approach promotes cognitive thinking, brand recall, and recognition, allowing firms flexibility in changing their value propositions. For example, Volkswagen's slogan "Somewhere between tuxedo and birthday suit" doesn't communicate anything definite about their products but forces consumers to form associations.However, the effectiveness of this strategy depends on several factors:

1. Consumer attitudes towards tagline ads

2. Perception of tagline ads

3. Brand motives for using ambiguous taglines

These findings suggest that while ambiguity can be a powerful tool, it must be carefully crafted to align with brand image and consumer expectations.

Social and Political Activism

Billboards have also become targets for activism, as seen in the phenomenon of "adbusting." This form of activism alters existing brand communication on billboards to promote social/political issues or criticize the targeted brand. Research indicates that adbusting has ambiguous effects on consumer perception:

• It raises ad awareness due to the incongruency with existing brand schemata

• The impact on cognitive and behavioral outcomes depends on the content of the adbust

Adbusts targeting social or political issues have less negative impact on brand perception compared to those directly criticizing the brand. This highlights the delicate balance brands must strike when addressing social issues through billboard advertising.

Cultural Representation and Inclusivity

The ongoing debate surrounding cultural representation in advertising is also reflected in billboard controversies. The evolution of iconic brands like Barbie demonstrates how billboards and other advertising mediums can both reflect and shape societal norms. As brands strive for more inclusive and diverse portrayals, billboards serve as highly visible indicators of these efforts, sometimes generating controversy when they challenge existing perceptions.

Digital Information Literacy and Misinformation

In the context of the 2024 elections, efforts are being made to use social media platforms like Instagram to build digital information literacy and counteract disinformation. While not directly related to billboards, this initiative highlights the broader media landscape in which billboard advertising operates. Advertisers must be aware of the potential for their messages to be misinterpreted or manipulated in the digital sphere.

Implications for Advertisers

1. Brand Image Impact: Research on supermarket brand image demonstrates how various elements, including advertising, contribute to customer perceptions and behaviors. Billboard campaigns should be carefully aligned with overall brand strategy to maintain consistency and positive associations.

2. Regulatory Awareness: The controversy surrounding alcohol advertising exposure among Chinese adolescents serves as a reminder of the potential regulatory scrutiny faced by certain industries. Advertisers must be mindful of ethical considerations and potential legal restrictions when planning billboard campaigns.

3. Local Context: The study on Hungarian anti-immigration campaigns illustrates how billboard messages can be interpreted differently based on local cultural and political contexts. International brands should be particularly cautious when deploying billboard campaigns across diverse markets.

4. Digital Integration: While billboards remain a powerful traditional medium, advertisers should consider how they integrate with digital campaigns. The study on Netflix subscription intentions demonstrates the importance of a holistic approach to brand image across various channels.

In conclusion, billboards in 2024 continue to be potent generators of controversy and public discourse. Their ability to capture attention and provoke debate underscores their enduring relevance in the advertising landscape. However, advertisers must navigate a complex web of social, political, and cultural considerations to harness the power of billboards effectively while minimizing potential backlash.

—

1. Medosch, A. (2003). Freie Netze. Geschichte, Politik und Kultur offener WLAN Netze [Free Networks. History, politics and culture of open wireless networks]. Heise Medien.

2. Nisbet, E. C., & Shanahan, J. (2004). MSRG special report: Restrictions on civil liberties, views of Islam, & Muslim Americans. Media & Society Research Group, Cornell University.

3. Goldberg, L. (2012). TLC Cancels 'All-American Muslim'. The Hollywood Reporter.

4. Dubofsky, M. (2002). Paul Robeson and the Black Press: The 1950 Passport Controversy. The Journal of African American History, 87(3), 339-354.

5. Ommen, B. (2016). The Politics of the Superficial: Visual Rhetoric & the Protocol of Display. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.